If the „Jesus Wife” fragment is a forgery meant to create a hype, then scholars who were duped should admit to having been duped. Unless they enjoyed it or want the fake to be true.
A few weeks ago I asked here what further news there was about the so-called „Jesus’ wife” fragment announced to the world in late summer 2012. Since then, despite direct inquiry to Prof. King (the email address listed for her no longer valid) and asking several scholars who were in various ways directly involved in the analysis of the item last year, it has proven impossible to get anything further than the last notice about it given in early 2013, that it was undergoing further „tests”. (How long does it take to conduct such tests, after all?)
We do know that the article on the fragment by Prof. King on the fragment announced as forthcoming in Harvard Theological Review was put on hold, and, so far as one can tell, seems now likely permanently so (i.e., it isn’t going to appear). It also seems that the TV programme in preparation…
Vezi articol original 550 de cuvinte mai mult